[LON-CAPA-users] New Content/Problem Editor - Input needed NOW

Stuart Raeburn raeburn at msu.edu
Sun Oct 12 10:53:08 EDT 2014


> I want two really new products :  an editor and a converter.
> For the converter:
> I would also like to see a little conversion program available that takes
> a problem that was in some document/text format and convert it to a
> Loncapa problem format.

Although discussion of the conversion capabilities of the current  
LON-CAPA is a little off-topic, just a quick reminder to mailing list  
subscribers of the testbank import functionality currently available  
in Authoring Space, added in LON-CAPA 1.2 (plain text import only),  
and extended in 2.7 (2008) to also support import of RTF and HTML  
formatted content.

Question types which may be imported are: Multiple Choice, True/False,  
Multiple Answer, Essay, Fill-in-the-blank, and Ranking/ordering.

Images embedded in imported content are preserved:
(i) for RTF documents, the images are extracted from the RTF using  
(ii) for HTML documents, the user will be prompted to upload images  
referenced in the file during the initial file upload

See: https://loncapa.msu.edu/adm/help/tex/Testbank_Formatting.hlp
for information about question formatting required in the uploaded file.

Stuart Raeburn
LON-CAPA Academic Consortium

> Hi,
> I have been programming a long time, mostly with XML edit, but I use the
> color editor when I want snippets of code for problem types or inserts
> whose exact format I've forgotten.
> The XML editor may be sparse, but the color editor is way too big (long?)
> for a screen. It's easy to lose your place long question with many options.
> I want two really new products :  an editor and a converter.
> For the editor:
> I really like the idea of a wysiwyg.
> I like having code snippets as selectable inserts.
> I like the XML editor.
> Here's an idea: How about a split screen similar to a lot of the
> programming IDE's out there. Each pane can be turned on or off to avoid
> clutter. Each pane can be moved outside the current window, into it's own
> window for easy reference.
> I visualize one pane as the XML editor, one pane as a sidebar of code
> snippet selections and one pane as a sandbox that runs the problem as it
> is so far - a "What does the student see so far" window. That would be the
> all improtant "wyg" part of wysiwyg. Like the "tryit" editor - an example
> can be found here:
> [ http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/tryit.asp?filename=tryjsref_style_display
> ]http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/tryit.asp?filename=tryjsref_style_display .
> The code snippet sidebar can be organized into button menus. Maybe:
> problem types, perl or javascript stuff, media inserts, graph stuff,
> everything that is available on the color editor drop down menus. (Maybe
> even some snippets that do specific things, like pick randomly from a list
> of images.) Each menu might have a description, and a visual of what it
> does in the problem (an example.) When selected, an example problem might
> open in a window with the pertinent code snippet highlighted for easy
> copy/paste into the XML editor, or maybe just the code with an
> explanation. When dropped into the XML editor, it's effect will be
> reflected in the "wyg" pane of the problem so far.
> It would be a little bit similar to the large array of problem types
> available when starting a problem. I would imagine having not just the
> name of the problem type, but a picture of a sample problem output pop
> up..
> ( While we're discussing this, maybe we can fix that page too. Make the
> selection of problem type not driven by names, but pictures of a sample
> output. It's annoying to have to click on each name and look over the
> samples until you hit the one you really wanted.)
> For the converter:
> I would also like to see a little conversion program available that takes
> a problem that was in some document/text format and convert it to a
> Loncapa problem format. To make it simpler, maybe the author could
> highlight the variable names, and choose the problem type format before
> submitting the question text to the program.
> I think that would go a really long way making new teachers comfortable.
> They can take the tons of this stuff they already have and get their
> favorites into loncapa. They can also feel comfortable creating new stuff
> in any word processor and convert it to loncapa.
> Such a converter may seem to have limited capability, but I would estimate
> that a good 80-90% of the stuff I've seen could be handled by even a
> simple converter. Certainly it could handle multiple choice and fill in
> the blanks, and simple numerical questions, and questions with
> combinations of these as parts. (I've made one for fill in the blanks and
> simple numerical problems. I dislike typing.)
> It wouldn't even have to be a perfect conversion, just get a base
> framework in the XML editor from which to work. If it's multiple choice,
> stick a multiple choice snippet into the XML using the text that's they've
> input. Let the author flesh it out further. If there's an image in the
> doc, stick an image snippet in the XML. If there's a graph in the doc,
> stick a graph snippet in the XML. Now the author has a really good place
> to start tweaking if necessary. (If it detects some kind of insert, it
> could ask - do you want this to become a dynamic graph or an image?)
> So, I'd like : a document converter, and an editor with sidebar helper
> screens and a wyg (what you got). Now it becomes a collaboration between
> author and machine.
> Brad

More information about the LON-CAPA-users mailing list