[LON-CAPA-users] Referencing a part with multiple responses in a sequence

[Stefan Bisitz]

Sorry, Doug. I've overlooked:
 > 210.11 does not work

I (also) wonder why this works with only one part but not with two.

Anybody?

Stefan Bisitz


Am 08.10.2012 18:52 schrieb Mills, Douglas G:
> HI Stefan,
>
> Thank you, but I don't think that will work because the first half of the
> condition is what I already had and that doesn't work, so appending the
> 210.12 part to it I don't think can help. In other words, if what you've
> suggested evaluates to true, then what I already tried:
>
> ( (&EXT('user.resource.resource.210.11','inlab4') eq 'excused')
>
> should evaluate to true on its own.
>
> Doug
>
>
> On 10/8/12 11:34 AM, "Stefan Bisitz" <st.bisitz at ostfalia.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> A bit longish, but should work:
>>
>> ( (&EXT('user.resource.resource.210.11','inlab4') eq 'excused') &&
>> (&EXT('user.resource.resource.210.12','inlab4') eq 'excused') )
>>
>> Stefan Bisitz
>>
>>
>> Am 08.10.2012 18:10 schrieb Mills, Douglas G:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Hitting a new twist in our ongoing saga of collecting data inlab and
>>> passing it via sequence references to postlab for students to work
>>> with. We?re only letting them access postlabs if they have entered all
>>> of their data in the lab OR if the instructor excuses their first lab
>>> data entry (saves the instructor from having to excuse all entries).
>>>    The code for the conditional in the sequence allowing for the excused
>>> status option looks like this:
>>>
>>> (&EXT('user.resource.resource.210.11','inlab4') eq 'excused')
>>>
>>> This has worked great for the first three labs because the first three
>>> labs have each had only one response (response id 11) in the first part
>>> (part id 210).  In lab 4, however, we have two responses in Part 210:
>>> response id 11 and response id 12.  Excusing apparently takes place at
>>> the part level.  How should that be indicated in the conditional for the
>>> sequence?  210.11 does not work. I tried just removing the response id
>>> but simply having 210 does not work either. I thought maybe it?s
>>> analogous to not having parts in a problem and referencing it as 0, but
>>> 210.0 does not work.  Can anyone point me in the right direction here?
>>>    Thank you!
>>>
>>> Doug
>>>
>>> Douglas Mills
>>> Director of Instructional Technologies
>>> Department of Chemistry
>>> University of Illinois
>>> dmills at illinois.edu
>>> (217) 244-5739
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LON-CAPA-users mailing list
>>> LON-CAPA-users at mail.lon-capa.org
>>> http://mail.lon-capa.org/mailman/listinfo/lon-capa-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LON-CAPA-users mailing list
>> LON-CAPA-users at mail.lon-capa.org
>> http://mail.lon-capa.org/mailman/listinfo/lon-capa-users
>
>
> Doug
>
> Douglas Mills
> Director of Instructional Technologies
> Department of Chemistry
> University of Illinois
> dmills at illinois.edu
> (217) 244-5739
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LON-CAPA-users mailing list
> LON-CAPA-users at mail.lon-capa.org
> http://mail.lon-capa.org/mailman/listinfo/lon-capa-users
>