[LON-CAPA-cvs] cvs: modules /gerd/roleclicker summary.tex

www lon-capa-cvs@mail.lon-capa.org
Mon, 23 May 2005 00:33:52 -0000


This is a MIME encoded message

--www1116808432
Content-Type: text/plain

www		Sun May 22 20:33:52 2005 EDT

  Modified files:              
    /modules/gerd/roleclicker	summary.tex 
  Log:
  Eric's edits
  
  
--www1116808432
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="www-20050522203352.txt"

Index: modules/gerd/roleclicker/summary.tex
diff -u modules/gerd/roleclicker/summary.tex:1.1 modules/gerd/roleclicker/summary.tex:1.2
--- modules/gerd/roleclicker/summary.tex:1.1	Sat May 21 13:47:56 2005
+++ modules/gerd/roleclicker/summary.tex	Sun May 22 20:33:50 2005
@@ -27,45 +27,37 @@
 	\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.eps, .jpg}
 	\fi
 
-Peer Instruction has been around for almost 15 years; its effect has been well-researched, and the techniques have found broad adoption, particularly in science teaching. As part of the classroom activities, the instructor would 
-present a question (typically multiple-choice style), and students are asked to respond individually (through hand signs, colored cards, 
-or technological means such as Personal Response Systems (PRSs, ``clickers'')).
-Based on the initial response distribution, the educator might decide to follow up with a second round of having the learners
-discuss the problem with each other (``think-pair-share''), and then responding again.
-
-At the heart of Peer Instruction are student-student discussions.
-However, a formal research study of the discussion process itself has not been carried out -- is it as effective as it could be? 
-
-\noindent - what happens in groups where all partners agree?
-\newline - are post-discussion responses better simply because stronger students dominate the discussion?
-\newline - are disinterested students profiting from the discussions?
-
-We believe that the current ``clickers'' are a transient technology, and that the next generation communication devices will open up new avenues for personal responses and Peer Instruction, and be an enabling tool for new pedagogies 
--- pedagogies we aim to explore today, while at same time, we are offering a phased transition path to both early and late adapters of current classroom technology.
-We aim to research the educational effects of the following technology-mediated extensions of peer-teaching practice:
-
-\noindent{\it Computer-Guided Group Formation} - In computer-guided group formation, the computer will be forming the groups based on the initial learner responses, and ensure that within the constraints of the lecture hall seating arrangement, groups with a diversity of initial opinions are formed.  
-\newline{\it Different Question Types} - More sophisticated response devices allow for the deployment of more sophisticated question types, such as image-response, mix-and-match, multiple-response multiple-choice and open-ended numerical/symbolic math questions.
-\newline{\it Randomized Questions} - More sophisticated response devices allow for randomizing scenarios just enough such that students can discuss the same underlying principle, yet still need to draw their own conclusions and arrive at their own solutions.
-
+Since its introduction 15 years ago, Peer Instruction has been broadly adopted, particularly in science teaching, and
+a number of studies of its effect across disciplines and across a range of institutions have been published. The goal of Peer Instruction is to make the students think critically about the material and participate actively in the learning process. To accomplish this goal the instructor periodically breaks up the class by asking a short conceptual question (a `ConcepTest') that challenges the students to put the material at hand into practice. The students respond using a show of hands, flashcards, or infrared `clickers'.
+The students then discuss the question with each other and then respond again.
+
+The Erskine College, Michigan State University and Harvard University parntership will investigate how to use technology to optimize the effectiveness of the discussions in Peer Instruction. To this end they will develop a classroom communication system that allows the use of consumer devices such as PDAs and cellphones. The system will seamlessly integrate current `clicker' technology with more advanced communication devices, offering instructors nationwide a gradual transition path to an advanced classroom network.
+
+Using this system the effectiveness of the following technology-mediated enhancements to Peer Instruction will be investigated:
+
+\noindent{\it Computer-Guided Discussions} - The classroom network will guide the discussion by pairing students with different answers.  
+\newline{\it Different Question Types} - The proposed classroom network will allow the use of 
+more sophisticated question types, such as image-response, mix-and-match, multiple-response multiple-choice and 
+open-ended numerical/symbolic math questions.
+\newline{\it Randomized Questions} - More sophisticated response devices can provide students with randomized variations to the scenario, 
+so that students can discuss the underlying principle but not simply accept the answer .
 
 
 The proposed project has three phases:
 
-\noindent 1. Formal analysis of peer-discussion behavior using currently available techniques, in parallel with systems and content integration
-\newline 2. Introduction of technology-mediated extensions to the current techniques and analysis of their impact on discussion behavior 
-and traditional outcome measures
+\noindent 1. Formal analysis of peer-discussion behavior using currently available technology, in parallel with systems and content integration
+\newline 2. Introduction of technology-mediated enhancements and assessment of their impact on pedagogy
 \newline 3. Commoditizing and dissemination of successful techniques
 
-We will focus on physics content, where a broad research base on existing techniques already exists, and where research-based content for peer-teaching using current techniques is readily available. We will work with undergraduate students in introductory algebra- and calculus-based physics courses at a spectrum of institutions.
+We will focus on physics content, where a broad research base on existing techniques already exists, and where research-based content for Peer Instruction using clickers is readily available. We will work with undergraduate students in introductory algebra- and calculus-based physics courses at a spectrum of institutions.
 
-{\it Intellectual Merit:}
-Peer Instruction has proven successful in outcome-oriented evaluations; in its first phase,
-this project will add process-oriented data to the research body. In its second phase, the project will extend and enhance the Peer Instruction technique through advanced technological means, and assess the impact of these
+{\bf Intellectual Merit:}
+Peer Instruction has proven successful in outcome-oriented evaluations; in the first phase,
+this project will add process-oriented data to the research body. In the second phase, the project will extend and enhance the Peer Instruction technique through advanced technological means, and assess the impact of these
 modifications, both in outcome and process. 
 
-{\it Broader Impact:} This project has a broader impact potential, because, like many of the other efforts in Physics Education Research (PER), it is carried out within regular college
-venues.  The three  participating institutions, an ivy league school, a large state university, and a small liberal arts college, host different student 
-populations and offer different teaching environments. This allows to study a wide and diverse range of educational settings. All developed software is open-source and will be made freely available.
+{\bf Broader Impact:} This project has very broad impact potential, because it is carried out within regular college
+venues.  The three  participating institutions, an ivy league school, a large state university, and a small liberal arts college, serve different student populations and offer different teaching environments. This diversity allows the partner institutions to study a wide and diverse range of educational settings. The proposed work also offers regional diversity, because the collaborating schools come from three culturally different parts of the United States.
+
 \end{document}
 \end

--www1116808432--