[LON-CAPA-users] sig figs
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:51:21 -0400
Mark Lucas wrote:
> Is "3+2" a valid designation for sig figs?
> <responseparam description="Significant Figures" type="int_range,0-12"
> default="3+2" name="sig" />
> I've got a problem coded this way. It does not accept
> 360 N, it does not accept 360.1N. It DOES accept 360. N.
> Did things just get pickier with 1.0.1?
Actually, the form 3+1-1 causes lots of problems. I just had about a
long phone call from a user where this error caused lots of problems
just about an hour ago myself! Please copy yourself on the bug at:
Michigan State University