[LON-CAPA-users] correct answer changing to incorrect
James Mueller
lon-capa-users@mail.lon-capa.org
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:03:39 -0500
Stuart,
The student was almost certainly on an access server. Where would I look to see from which server(s) he made each of these submission?
-Jim
On Dec 8, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Stuart Raeburn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The timestamp of Tue Nov 30 05:10:17 am is significant here.
>
> 5.10 am is the time LON-CAPA servers check their connections with
> other servers in the network, and resend any critical transactions to
> library servers which could not be completed when submission
> originally occurred.
>
> One possibility is that the student was logged in to a server other
> than the library server, when the student's submission on part 11 was
> made, and the server was unable to complete the transaction to store
> it on the pitt.edu library server. Given that part 11 was graded
> correct on 11/21, if this submission occurred after that date, but
> before the due date on 11/29, then correctness and tries information
> must also have not been transferred from library server to session
> server initially; hence a try was allowed and this was "Trial 1" as
> far as the access server was concerned.
>
> When pending transactions were re-tried the next morning the store on
> the library server was successful. I recommend looking at the
> submission history to see which LON-CAPA host was hosting the
> student's session for this submission:
>
> Tue Nov 30 05:10:17 am 2010 (EST)Part: 11 (ID 12) Trial 1 0.0490 m
> Part: 11 incorrect
>
> Stuart Raeburn
> MSU LON-CAPA group
>
> Quoting James Mueller <mueller@pitt.edu>:
>
>> More details on this problem.
>>
>> If I check grades, he does have credit for getting this one correct.
>> It is just that when he looks at the problem, it is displayed as
>> incorrect answer. The other thing I don't understand is the due
>> date for this problem was Nov. 29, so where does this incorrect
>> submission on Nov 30 come from?
>>
>> -J. Mueller
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 3:51 PM, James Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> A student just complained that he solved a problem but later Lon
>>> Capa said he was incorrect. I looked at his submissions and see
>>> the following. From the submissions, it looks like he completed
>>> every part of the problem on Nov 21, but on Nov 30, his first
>>> incorrect answer for the first part appears to be entered again,
>>> and it is listed as the first trial. I can give him credit for
>>> getting this correct, but does anyone have any ideas as to how this
>>> might happen?
>>>
>>> -Jim Mueller
>>>
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:34:31 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 11 (ID 12) Trial not counted 0.0490
>>> Part: 11 no_unit
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:34:33 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 11 (ID 12) Trial 1 0.0490 m
>>> Part: 11 incorrect
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:35:54 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 11 (ID 12) Trial 2 2.0944 m
>>> Part: 11 approx_ans
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:38:14 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 13 (ID 14) Trial not
>>> counted 284.8377 m/s
>>> Part: 13 sig_fail
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:38:19 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 13 (ID 14) Trial 1 284.81 m/s
>>> Part: 13 incorrect
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:38:23 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 13 (ID 14) Trial 2 284.84 m/s
>>> Part: 13 incorrect
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:39:19 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 13 (ID 14) Trial 3 45.33 m/s
>>> Part: 13 approx_ans
>>> Sun Nov 21 06:41:29 pm 2010 (EST)Part: 15 (ID 16) Trial 1 6.66 m/s
>>> Part: 15 approx_ans
>>> Tue Nov 30 05:10:17 am 2010 (EST)Part: 11 (ID 12) Trial 1 0.0490 m
>>> Part: 11 incorrect
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LON-CAPA-users mailing list
> LON-CAPA-users@mail.lon-capa.org
> http://mail.lon-capa.org/mailman/listinfo/lon-capa-users